When We Were Shamans, We Looked to the Stars
- Louis Velazquez, M.D.

- Feb 24
- 3 min read
An evolved way to provide psychiatric care.

In this remote science fiction movie from 1984, recently widowed Jenny Hayden is in a state of bereavement, contemplating the meaning of her life when she is confronted with what she imagines is a psychotic hallucination of her deceased husband. She is initially terrified, believing that she has lost her mind in the midst of her grief. Fast-forward: a benevolent alien species from across the galaxy has responded to the 1977 Voyager II space probed launched with a gold analog disc communicating a message of peace and inviting alien species to visit. Starman is an emissary from the cosmos. His vehicle is shot down by NORAD and he is forced to seek refuge in Jenny’s home. He is a ball of energy that clones Jenny’s deceased husband from a strand of hair. He is a wise but innocent ethereal being on a mission of peace, but he instead encounters a primitive and angry species. Was there a bait and switch?
The arc of the story begins with disbelief and pain. Jenny learns to trust that she is not psychotic and comes to appreciate the uncorrupt beauty of this celestial soul. Spaceman teaches her with simplicity and the conviction of certain truths. They journey and flee from the would-be promethean Federal government who would like to capture and dissect Spaceman to acquire his knowledge and power. In their journey to take Spaceman to meet his ride home in the Arizona desert, they survive multiple travails. Spaceman reveals his ability to discern character, heal, and stay the course with a planned destination. In this trajectory, Jenny begins to heal and recognize that her life has meaning, and she has a renewed desire to continue with her life. Before catching his ride to return home, Starman uses his borrowed DNA vessel to leave her pregnant. Starman tells her that her child will have Starman’s knowledge and will know what to do with it.
Whoa!!! Is this just another messianic trope? Clearly, I think this old movie to be quite beautiful. It is an old story. Perhaps every civilization has had such stories or myths. Our species is reportedly 300, 000 years old and the social use of language is perhaps half as old. Language has enabled our species to be self-aware about our mortality. As we organized into hunter gatherer communities, the need to negotiate and cooperate has allowed our species to advance to our current state. Conflict and discontent were the inevitable result of individuals learning how to fulfill social functions; along with hunters and gatherers, there was need to assign an early role for a liaison to the unknown depths of the night and human soul. These were the shamans. Shamans observed and communicated; they also fulfilled the role of healers. For much of our history, shamans have attempted to guide our species to greater survivability and meaning, though not always as successfully as Starman.
In our intensely complicated modern civilization, we all need healers and liaisons with the unknown. The role of shaman has meandered through various rebranding throughout history, from religious clergy, to gurus, to
cult belief systems like Heaven’s Gate Cult which waited for a ride from the Hale Bopp comet in 1977. Medicine has also entered the fray for the role of healers of both the body and soul. Today, we all seek a greater understanding of ourselves and to maintain health throughout the health span, not simply the lifespan. The goal is not simply to live a long life, but to live a long and healthy life. We define health as the robust pursuit of a sound mind and vigorous and functional body. We were once shamans, but we are now healers. As a psychiatrist for over 35 years, I have seen medicine and psychiatry in particular evolve. There is much debate and angst in medicine today. There are debates about vaccines, “healthy at any weight”, and the definition of mental illness. Keeping it simple, I believe that modern healers should not deviate from the Hippocratic ethic to first do no harm. Physicians should maintain humility to always recognize that there is something more to learn and always debate with an open mind while anchoring treatment in the valid science.
In the last three decades, we have seen much debate in psychiatry regarding the definitions of autism, bipolar disorder, and the value of accountability when discussing personality disorders. There is so much more to psychiatry than just the panoply of pharmaceuticals we give patients to make them more functional. Perhaps modern medicine would do well to channel a little of the Starman in guiding us through the arc of our stories.




Comments